Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

11-8889 - Perillo et al v. Cassandro

Download Files


Document in Context
11-8889 - Perillo et al v. Cassandro
October 14, 2015
PDF | More
Decision After Trial. The Court finds the Plaintiffs have satisfied their burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, the elements of section 523(a)(2)(A) and, accordingly, concludes that the judgment debt owed by the Debtor is nondischargeable. The Court shall enter judgment consistent with this Memorandum Decision forthwith. (RE: related document(s)1 Complaint filed by Plaintiff William Perillo). Signed on 10/14/2015 (ssw) . Modified on 10/14/2015 for clarification. (ssw).
April 19, 2016
PDF | More
Errata Order; Memorandum Opinion, Dated October 14, 2015. The Decision After Trial, dated October 14, 2015, entered in the above-captioned adversaryproceeding should be corrected as follows: On page 10, in the fourth line down from the top of the page, the case citation for Nunnery v. Rountree (In re Rountree), 340 Fed. Appx. 899, 901 (4th Cir. 2009) (citing Field v. Mans, 516U.S. 59, 61 (1995)) should be corrected to read Colombo v. Sharp (In re Sharp), 340 Fed. Appx. 899, 901 (4th Cir. 2009) (citing Field v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59, 61 (1995)). (RE: related document(s)76 Opinion/Decision for External Web Page). Signed on 4/19/2016 (ssw)