Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

00-1160 - Figueroa v. Walsh


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
00-1160 - Figueroa v. Walsh
May 1, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 40 Motion and 41 Motion. As per the attached Memorandum & Order, Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion is hereby deemed to be a successive petition for habeas corpus. To the extent that his arguments address proper grounds for relief on a successive habeas motion, this court is without jurisdiction. Petitioner's claims are therefore transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Clerk of Court shall transfer the motion as a successive habeas petition in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of Court shall also serve a copy of this Memorandum & Order on the pro se Petitioner. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/1/08. (Garaufis, Nicholas)
March 4, 2010
PDF | More
iffeny)MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Petitioner's motion is DENIED. (Docket Entries47,48 and 51.) A certificate of appealability shall not issue. See Document for Complete Detail. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/3/2010. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, T
May 22, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER: Figueroa's Rule 60(b)(6) motion and his motions for discovery and to appoint counsel are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TRANSFER Figueroa's supplemental submissions (Dkts. 66, 67, and 68) to the Second Circuit for possible certification as a successive petition. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/16/2013. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
November 15, 2016
PDF | More
. The Clerk is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/09/2016. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)ORDER TRANSFERRING SUBMISSIONS AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to TRANSFER Petitioner's 2016 Submissions (Dkts. 72, 73, and 74) to the Second Circuit for possible certification as a successive petition
July 11, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER re 78 Motion for Reconsideration. Petitioner's Motion (Dkt. 78) is DENIED. Petitioner has violated the court's clear warning about successive habeas petitions, a warning issued less than six months before Petitioner signed and sent his Motion. The court must therefore escalate the consequences of non-compliance: Petitioner is hereby cautioned that filing additional meritless motions may, on notice and opportunity to be heard, lead the court to enjoin him from further filings in this matter without first obtaining permission from the court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of this order to pro se Petitioner. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/06/2017. (c/m to petitioner pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
July 31, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 80 Motion for Reconsideration. The court DENIES Petitioner's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 80) and finds that NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE with regard to both this Order and the Court's July 11, 2017, Order (Dkt. 79). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of this Order to pro se Petitioner. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/28/2017. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)