Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

01-3934 - Best Payphones, Inc. v. City of New York, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
01-3934 - Best Payphones, Inc. v. City of New York, et al
May 3, 2005
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 Letter from Charles Ryans to Magistrate Judge Kiyo Matsumoto, dated 4/4/05, requesting pre-motion conference for a motion to amend and supplement the complaint. See attached Report and Recommendation for details. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 5/3/05. (Onozawa, Tomoko)
August 5, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER denying plaintiff's application for leave to amend the complaints in 00 cv 2007, 03 cv 3978, 01 cv 3934, 01 cv 8506, 03 cv 192, and 04 cv 3541, and dismissing the complaint in 05 cv 1702. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on August 5, 2005. (Gleeson, John)
March 30, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER granting 47 Motion to Consolidate Cases. See attached. So Ordered by JudgeKiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/29/06. (Matsumoto, Kiyo)
September 22, 2006
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Order denying request for a pre-motion conference for leave to file a motion to stay. See attached. So Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/22/06. (Matsumoto, Kiyo)
September 22, 2006
PDF | More
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Order denying request for a pre-motion conference for leave to file a motion to stay. See attached. (Note correction to docket number in caption.) So Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/22/06. (Matsumoto, Kiyo)
August 16, 2010
PDF | More
ill have no choice but to dismiss this action with prejudice. I will not tolerate further needless filings, all targeted to circumvent the inevitable conclusion that Plaintiff must file an amended complaint if it wishes to continue with the present matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. on 8/16/2010. Associated Cases: 1:03-cv-00192-JG -ALC, 1:01-cv-03934-JG -ALC, 1:01-cv-08506-JG-ALC (Hunter-Hicks, Tara) Modified on 8/17/2010 (Hunter-Hicks, Tara). Modified on 8/17/2010 (Hunter-Hicks, Tara).ORDER: Denying 213, 248, and 254 in case CV-03-192. Denying 115, 142 and 146 in case CV-01-3934. Denying 117 and 121 in case CV-01-8506. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file an amended complaint pleading claims 1 and 3 from the SAC, insofar as Plaintiff seeks damages based on those claims. It shall do so by August 20, 2010. The Court previously ordered the parties to meet and confer as to which claims/paragraphs from the SAC remain valid after dismissal. After one and half years of disputes, the parties have reported that they have reached an impasse as to only ten paragraphs: 3,5,9,72,153,161,162,167, 169, and paragraph (j) of the wherefore clause, from Plaintiff's "pre-answer stipulation". (Docket Nos. 248,254.) I have reviewed the City's objections and I find its objections valid. Plaintiff is ordered to revise its "pre-answer stipulation" accordingly and file the amended complaint reflecting those changes. Defendants shall answer the amended complaint by October 5, 2010 and the parties shall appear for a discovery scheduling conference on October 14, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 504 N. If Plaintiff continues with its unwavering stance that it will not file an amended complaint, the Court w
June 15, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying (427) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:03-cv-00192-JG-VMS; denying (269) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:01-cv-03934-JG-VMS; denying (243) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:01-cv-08506-JG-VMS. Please see attached document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 6/15/2015. Associated Cases: 1:03-cv-00192-JG-VMS, 1:01-cv-03934-JG-VMS, 1:01-cv-08506-JG-VMS (Lozar, Ryan)
February 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 447 Motion for Discovery in case 1:03-cv-00192-JG-VMS: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Defendants' spoliation motion is denied except to the extent that Defendants are awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion. Counsel shall confer to determine if they can come to an agreement as to the amount of attorneys' fees to be paid. If they cannot come to an agreement, Defendants shall submit affidavit(s) and supporting time records on or before March 11, 2016. Plaintiff may submit an opposition by March 17, 2016. No reply permitted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/26/2016. Associated Cases: 1:03-cv-00192-JG-VMS, 1:01-cv-03934-JG-VMS, 1:01-cv-08506-JG-VMS (Calabrese, Corey)