Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

07-200 - Maverick recording Company et al v. Chowdhury

Download Files


Document in Context
07-200 - Maverick recording Company et al v. Chowdhury
August 19, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiffs' motion is granted in all respects: (1) the first counterclaim seeking attorney's fees is dismissed because a request for attorney's fees under the Copyright Act is not a proper subject of a counterclaim; the defendants will have the opportunity to move for an award of attorney's fees if they prevail in these actions; (2) the second counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement is dismissed because it is entirely redundant of the plaintiffs' infringement claim, and does not raise an independent case or controversy; (3) the third counterclaim sounding in antitrust is dismissed because it fails as a matter of law to establish an antitrust violation; and (4) copyright misuse is (i) struck as an affirmative defense for the reasons set forth in Lindor and (ii) dismissed as the fourth counterclaim because copyright misuse is not grounds for affirmative relief. Ordered by Senior Judge David G. Trager on 8/19/2008. (Spitser, Brian)