Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-2050 - Todd v. Graham


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-2050 - Todd v. Graham
May 23, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court directs petitioner to show cause by written affirmation, within 30 days from entry of this Memorandum and Order, why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred by the AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations. Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 209 (2006); Acosta v. Artuz, 221 F.3d 117, 124 (2d Cir. 2000). No answer shall be required at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days or until petitioner has complied with this Order. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant petition shall be dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(d). Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on May 22, 2008. (c/m to petitioner) (Lee, Tiffeny)
August 1, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Petition is dismissed as time-barred under AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on August 1, 2008. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)