Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

09-1844 - Lajszky v. Astrue

Download Files


Document in Context
09-1844 - Lajszky v. Astrue
May 11, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Brigandi is accordingly ordered to provide supplemental briefing to this Court by May 25, 2017, explaining why, under these facts, this Court should award him a percentage of Lajszky's past-due benefits as attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 406(b). Brigandi is instructed to specifically address whether-and if so, how-Lajszky's ultimate receipt of benefits can be construed as having been awarded "by reason of" a "favorable judgment" rendered by this Court in a case in which Brigandi was representing Lajszky. The government is also instructed to supplement its letter explaining its position in light of the above. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/11/2017. (Fernandez, Erica)