Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-2089 - Widjaja et al v. Kang Yue USA Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-2089 - Widjaja et al v. Kang Yue USA Corporation et al
September 22, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. As the Report and Recommendation correctly notes, and as the record makes clear, Plaintiff's Kim's own attorney acknowledges that he has not been able to locate or communicate with Plaintiff for some period of time despite several attempts. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that all claims in this action brought by Plaintiff Min Joongkin Kim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to take any and all appropriate action consistent with this Order, including terminating Plaintiff Min Joongkin Kim as a party, and entering any necessary judgment. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/21/2010. (Brucella, Michelle)
September 26, 2011
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 52 Motion for Leave to File: Pursuant to the attached Memorandum and Order,, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment establishing liability (Doc. No. 48) is GRANTED in its entirety with respect to plaintiffs Widjaja, Utama and Gunardi, and DENIED with respect to plaintiff Ng. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 45, 52, 53) is GRANTED with respect to all claims filed by plaintiff Ng, and DENIED AS MOOT with respect to plaintiff Kim, who was previously dismissed from this action. As only the issue of damages remains as to plaintiffs Widjaja, Utama and Gunardi, this matter is re-committed to the assigned Magistrate Judge for supervision of any settlement discussions, and all remaining pre-trial issues consistent with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/26/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
December 11, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting 69 Motion for Clarification on Damages. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Decision and Order, the plaintiffs are entitled to the difference between the full minimum wage and the reduced wage that they were paid, liquidated damages under the FLSA and the NYLL, and the amount of tips that the defendants illegally retained. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 12/11/2015. (Goeke, Justine) (Main Document 73 replaced on 12/14/2015) (Greene, Donna).
January 25, 2016
PDF | More
. ** See order for more details **. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 1/25/2016. (Greene, Donna)MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, that the plaintiffs are entitled to $13,575.35, representing the value of damages for the categories of claims about which the facts are undisputed. The plaintiffs are entitled to damages as set forth in the tables
February 17, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: For the reasons stated in the attached decision, the plaintiffs are entitled to $20,481.45. This amount is the sum of: 1) $6,906.10, which is the value of damages determined following the February 17, 2016 bench trial; and 2) $13,575.35, which is the value of damages previously determined on January 25, 2016. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 2/17/2016. (Goeke, Justine)
March 16, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 84 Motion for Attorney's Fees: For the reasons stated in the associated Memorandum and Order, I grant the plaintiffs' application for attorney's fees and costs. I award $39,522.50 in attorneys fees and $578 in costs and respectfully instruct the Clerk of the Court to enter an amended judgment that includes the total amount of $40,100.50 in attorneys fees and costs. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 3/16/2016. (Goeke, Justine)