Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-087 - USA v. Sebbern et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-087 - USA v. Sebbern et al
November 30, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Mr. Sebbern's motion to preclude the government from offering ballistics testimony is denied. However, before the government's ballistics expert can testify before the jury, the Court will conduct a hearing at which the government shall be required to lay a foundation for admitting the testimony of said expert. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 11/30/2012. (Frullo, Veronica)
November 30, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: defendant Waiters motion to suppress "all physical evidence" taken from him at the time of his arrest as "fruits of an unreasonable seizure" is denied. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 11/30/2012. (Frullo, Veronica)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 188 Motion to Amend as to Dontae Sebbern (1). For the reasons set forth above, the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the judgment in this case to reflect 1) that Defendant was convicted after a jury trial, not upon his plea of guilty; 2) that Defendant was acquitted of count ten of the superseding indictment, charging him with unlawful use of a firearm in connection with the drug trafficking offense charged in count nine; and 3) that Defendant was convicted under count five of the superseding indictment of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(i), not 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(l)(A)(ii) and 924(c)(l)(A) (iii). So Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 3/20/2017. (Lee, Tiffeny)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 185 Motion to Vacate, 189 Motion to Amend/Correct and 190 Motion to Appoint Counsel as to Dexter Waiters (2). For the reasons set forth above, the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the judgment in this case to reflect 1) that Defendant was convicted after a jury trial, not upon his plea of guilty; 2) that Defendant was acquitted of count ten of the superseding indictment, charging him with unlawful use of a firearm in connection with the drug- trafficking offense charged in count nine; and 3) that Defendant was convicted under count five of the superseding indictment of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(i), not 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(l)(A)(ii) and 924(c)(l)(A) (iii). Defendant's request that the Court rescind the separation order is denied without prejudice to filing a § 2241 petition in the appropriate district court after exhausting all administrative remedies. Defendant's application for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to refiling an application which articulates specific, meritorious issues that Defendant wishes to raise in his post-conviction motion. Defendant's motion for an extension of time in which to file his § 2255 motion is denied for lack of jurisdiction. So Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 3/20/2017. (Lee, Tiffeny)