Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-3910 - Williams v. Bradt


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-3910 - Williams v. Bradt
February 8, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Stay -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, pro se petitioner's request for a stay of the proceedings in this habeas matter be stayed pending his exhaustion of state remedies is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 2/8/2011. (Irizarry, Dora)
March 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed in its entirety. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, as he has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Opinion and Order to pro se Petitioner and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/30/2016. (Irizarry, Dora)
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying 60 Motion to Vacate -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Petitioner's motion for reconsideration and to vacate is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and Attached Written Summary Order to pro se petitioner. This case previously was closed pursuant to Court order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/30/2018. (Irizarry, Dora)