Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-1583 - Alford et al v. Administration for Children's Services et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-1583 - Alford et al v. Administration for Children's Services et al
June 6, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER : See attached order appointing Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as pro bono counsel to P.A., Jr. Pro bono counsel are directed to file a single pleading on behalf of P.A., Jr. in case number 10-CV-4661, captioned "Second Amended Complaint." Upon filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the claims raised in P.A., Jr.'s name by adult plaintiffs in 10-CV-4661 and 11-CV-1583 will be dismissed for lack of standing. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 6/6/2011. (Horowitz, Hayley)
September 11, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER on summary judgment motions in cases 1:10-cv-04661-JG-SMG and 1:11-cv-01583-JG-SMG. See the attached order. PA's motion is denied; Rodriguez's motion is denied; the City Defendants' and St. Vincent's Defendants' motions are granted in part and denied in part; and the Court defers ruling on Alford's and JA's motions. A status conference will be held on Monday, September 22, 2014, at 11:00am to discuss next steps in the case. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 9/11/2014. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-04661-JG-SMG, 1:11-cv-01583-JG-SMG (Aronoff, Peter)
October 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 202 Motion to Strike. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 10/27/2017. (Metzger, Daniel)
April 3, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: The Court's March 28, 2018 Order is TERMINATED. As set forth in the Court's amended April 3, 2018 Order, having addressed the parties' objections, Magistrate Judge Gold's Report and Recommendation 192 is adopted as the opinion of this Court with respect to the following: (1) Plaintiff Alford's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; (2) Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' procedural due process claims are GRANTED; (3) Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' substantive due process non-kinship placement claims are DENIED; (4) Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' substantive due process quality of care claims are DENIED with respect to J.A.'s claim and GRANTED with respect to Alford's claim on grounds of qualified immunity. With respect to Magistrate Judge Gold's recommendation regarding Plaintiffs' Monell claims, Defendants' motions for summary judgment are DENIED as to Defendant City with respect to Plaintiffs' ยง 1983 failure to change placement to kinship claim as this Court respectfully declines to adopt Magistrate Judge Gold's recommendation insofar as it limits the claim to the purported 20-day policy, and GRANTED in all other respects. See attached Order for detailsOrdered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 4/3/2018. (Valentin, Winnethka)