Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-2122 - Saint-Jean et al v. Emigrant Mortgage Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-2122 - Saint-Jean et al v. Emigrant Mortgage Company
September 25, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND ADD NEW PARTIES AND CLAIMS. As set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge to DENY the motion to dismiss and to GRANT the motion to amend the complaint and add new parties and claims is hereby ADOPTED. Under a de novo analysis detailed in the attached Memorandum, this Court has adopted in part and set aside in part the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs' federal and state law claims are timely and survive the motion to dismiss.See Attached. Ordered by Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 9/25/2014. (Day, Dominique)
June 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING Judge Orenstein's orders of April 18, 2014; August 4, 2014; and March 13, 2015. See attached. Ordered by Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 6/18/2015. (Figeroux, Davina)
December 10, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 377 Letter Motion to Seal. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to seal portions of the parties' briefs on summary judgment is denied in its entirety. The Clerk is directed, on December 29, 2015, to unseal those briefs (364 and 368), without attachments, as well as the entirety of the parties' letter briefs regarding this motion to seal (377 and 380), including attachments. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 12/10/2015. (Dollar, Thomas)
March 14, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 394. For the reasons explained in the attached M&O, defendants are directed to serve on the New York State Department of Financial Services ("DFS") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), no later than March 16, 2016, a copy of each communication with the DFS and the FDIC, respectively, that defendants believe is subject to sealing under the federal bank examination privilege, along with a copy of this M&O. To the extent that the DFS or the FDIC has any interest in sealing any of those communications, they are invited to submit a letter to the Court, by March 25, 2016, explaining their views. (See attached M&O for further details.) Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann on 3/14/2016. (Dollar, Thomas)