Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-1404 - McMahon v. Napolitano et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-1404 - McMahon v. Napolitano et al
April 8, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing certain individual defendants. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Also as set forth in the within Order, plaintiff's claims against defendants W. Daniel Baldwin, Cynthia Covell, Teresa Halpin, James T. Madden, Rachelle Lewis, and Geraldine Munsayac are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). No summons shall issue as to these defendants. Plaintiff's complaint against the remaining defendant, Secretary Janet Napolitano, may proceed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a summons for this defendant and the United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the complaint and this Order on this defendant without prepayment of fees. The case is also respectfully referred to the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The clerk of court is also respectfully requested to serve a copy of the within Order on the pro se plaintiff and to note service of the same on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/8/2013. (Kelley, Jamuna)
January 20, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Consequently, the court dismisses plaintiffs failure to promote claim and denies defendants motion in all other respects. The court deems plaintiffs motion amended as to plaintiffs failure to promote and retaliation claims and denies plaintiffs motion to amend to the extent she seeks to add additional claims or claims related to the agencys conditional offer in 2008 and allegations of breach relating to the settlement agreement at issue in plaintiffs other pending lawsuit, 12-cv-5878. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/20/2016. (Gong, LiJia)
January 20, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, plaintiff's motions to recuse Judge Matsumoto and Judge Levy are denied. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/20/2016. (Gong, LiJia)
April 1, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, plaintiff's motions for reconsideration are denied. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/1/2016. (Gong, LiJia)