Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-4607 - Raffaele v. City of New York et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-4607 - Raffaele v. City of New York et al
June 9, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER re 54 First MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal filed by Thomas D. Raffaele. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the motion to file plaintiff's memorandum of law in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss, as well as the attached CCRB report, under seal is denied. Plaintiffs counsel should confer with counsel for the City defendants to determine whether any particular information should be redacted for privacy purposes, and, no later than June 17, 2014, plaintiff should file an unsealed version of the memorandum of law and the CCRB report. In addition, any portions of the report that are immaterial to the motion need not be resubmitted to the court. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 6/9/2014. (Keefe, Reed)
October 30, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court grants the moving defendants motion to dismiss 56 in its entirety and plaintiffs following claims are hereby dismissed: (1) conspiracy claims pursuant to §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (Counts I, V, VI, VII and VIII); (2) denial of access claim pursuant to § 1983 (Count IV); (3) supervisory liability claim against Commissioner Kelley (Count IX); (4) municipal liability claim (Count X); (5) prima facie tort claim (Count XII); (6) slander and libel claims(Counts XIII and XV); and (7) all claims against the District Attorney defendants. In the absence of any request or proposals by plaintiff, the court denies leave to amend at this time. If plaintiff intends to amend his complaint, he must make his request including his proposed amendments within 14 days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 10/30/2015. (Gong, LiJia)
March 16, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court grants the defendants partial motion for summary judgment 109 and dismisses plaintiffs failure to intercede claim and his supervisory liability claim. The parties shall submit a joint status letter by March 23, 2017, advising the court whether they plan to move for summary judgment on the remaining claims or whether they wish to proceed to trial.Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/16/2017. (Fletcher, Camille)