Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-3638 - Oslzly et al v. Rosenblatt et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-3638 - Oslzly et al v. Rosenblatt et al
August 19, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, however, plaintiffs claims against defendants Rosenblatt, Dukas, Fulton, Laing and the four "unknown employees" listed in the caption of the complaint are dismissed without prejudice, as are plaintiffs claims under Title II and/or Title III of the ADA. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Chistopher Laing (clinical superviser), Lawrence Rosenblatt (Directory Bowery Residents Committee), Unknown Employee 1, Todd (Kelly?), Unknown Employee 2 (short with dreadlocks' possible homeless services police), Unknown Employee 3 (tall shaved head, pigeon-chested possible homeless services police), Unknown Employee 4 (petite nursing staff), Cynthia Dukas (independent living specialist) and Marilyn Fulton (independent living specialist) terminated. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 8/19/2014. c-m to pltff. by chambers. (Layne, Monique)
January 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 41 Motion for Leave to File; ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied, and his original complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/15/2016. (Cogan, Brian)