Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-3903 - Hester-Bey v. Donaruma, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-3903 - Hester-Bey v. Donaruma, et al.
September 8, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/5/2014. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica)
December 1, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: On 11/3/2014 and 11/10/2014, the Court received letters from Hester-Bey requesting that this action be re-opened and enclosing an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 14, 15.) The Court construes the 11/3/2014 and 11/10/2014 letters as a motion to re-initiate this action. Hester-Bey's 14 motion to re-open this case is granted. The Court affords Hester-Bey 30 days to submit an adequate complaint in this action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to again send Hester-Bey a sample civil rights complaint form. If Hester-Bey fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days of entry of this Order, the Court will construe his complaint as solely raising a Bivens claim against Marshal Donaruma related to his arrest and arraignment. Hester-Bey's requests to re-open the New York City Technical College case and transfer all of his pending cases to Judge Matsumoto are denied. The Court instructs Hester-Bey that any correspondence with the Court must be made in writing and filed with the Clerk of Court pursuant to the Local Rules for the Eastern District of New York and the Court's individual rules. Hester-Bey shall not contact this Court or the chambers of any judge in this district by telephone. Violation of this Order may result in a finding of contempt with appropriate sanctions. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 12/1/2014. (See document for further details.) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
March 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 65 Motion. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of the Plaintiffs' claims is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States. 368 U.S. 438,444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 3/23/2017. (c/m) (Lee, Tiffeny)