Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-4656 - CIT Bank, N.A. v. Hawkins et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-4656 - CIT Bank, N.A. v. Hawkins et al
September 28, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court ADOPTS IN FULL the R&R and accordingly, GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for default judgment; GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for judgment of foreclosure and sale, AWARDS Plaintiff costs in the amount of $2,260.07, GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's request to discontinue the action against the John Doe Defendants, and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's request for damages and attorneys' fees. See Porter v. Potter, 219 F. App'x 112 (2d Cir. 2007) (summary order). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully DIRECTED to enter judgment against Defendants consistent with this Order. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/25/2015. (fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
August 17, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The court finds no clear error, and therefore ADOPTS IN FULL Judge Pollack's R&R. Accordingly, the court AWARDS Plaintiff damages in the amount of $501,900.97; DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs request for attomeys' fees; GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs request to discontinue the action against Defendants U.S.A. o/b/o I.R.S.and NYSDTF; GRANTS Plaintiffs request to modify the caption as to the plaintiff line, but DENIES the request to modify the defendant line; and DIRECTS Plaintiff to submit a new proposed Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, consistent with the terms of this Order, that specifies conditions for the sale of the Property. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/15/2016. (Marziliano, August)
January 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, For the foregoing reasons, the court ADOPTS Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendations (Dkt. 74) to the extent it is consistent with the foregoing and GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Dkt. 71). The court AWARDS Plaintiff $10,887 in attorneys' fees. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 1/11/2018. (Lee, Tiffeny)