United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2021-05-12
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2018-06-15
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470
P0b002ee1adf454d7
DGPO
2021-05-12
2021-05-12
USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470
District
nyed
2nd
New York
2351
1:14-cv-07470
Brooklyn
civil
220
Foreclosure
28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Howard et al
1:14-cv-07470
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470
JU 4.15
1:14-cv-07470;14-7470
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
2nd Circuit
Brooklyn
U.S. Courts
author
aut
CIT Bank, N.A.
CIT Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff
CIT Group Inc.
CIT Group Inc.
Plaintiff
Stacy Dixon
Dixon
Stacy
Defendant
Tamisha Harriman
Harriman
Tamisha
Defendant
Janet Howard
Howard
Janet
Defendant
IMB HoldCo LLC
IMB HoldCo LLC
Plaintiff
Colleen McFarlane
McFarlane
Colleen
Defendant
New York City Environmental Control Board
New York City Environmental Control Board
Defendant
OneWest Bank Group LLC
OneWest Bank Group LLC
Plaintiff
OneWest Bank, N.A.
OneWest Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff
Edgar Ortega
Ortega
Edgar
Defendant
Nancy Ortega
Ortega
Nancy
Defendant
PNC Bank, National Association
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant
Winsbert Remy
Remy
Winsbert
Defendant
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470
District
nyed
2nd
New York
2351
1:14-cv-07470
Brooklyn
civil
220
Foreclosure
28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
New York
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Howard et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to re-filing a motion which cures the defects identified herein. That motion shall be filed on or before November 28, 2016, and should: 1. Annex to the Notice of Motion a properly captioned Statement of Material Facts which complies with the dictates of Local Civil Rule 56.1; 2. Provide some legal analysis with respect to whether the Note is a negotiable instrument, as defined in N.Y. U.C.C. § 1-201(21); 3. Ensure that the stamped indorsements on the original Note are entirely legible in the photocopies provided to the Court; 4. Provide a fuller explanation regarding the various indorsements, including some explanation of how the FDIC became involved, when the indorsements to IndyMac were made, and what authorized Plaintiff's employees to sign documents on behalf of the FDIC and MERS; and 5. Provide evidence in admissible form that Plaintiff possessed the Note at the time it commenced this action. The Court defers decision with respect to Plaintiff's remaining motions. The Court notes, however, that Plaintiff does not need a Court order to dismiss its claims against the Doe defendant. Plaintiff can voluntarily dismiss this defendant by filing a notice of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/26/2016. (Brucella, Michelle)
0
2016-10-27
D09002ee1ae0748d0
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-0
nyed-1_14-cv-07470_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/pdf/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-0.pdf
USCOURTS 1:14-cv-07470; CIT Bank, N.A. v. Howard et al;
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
New York
USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-0
0
2016-10-27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to re-filing a motion which cures the defects identified herein. That motion shall be filed on or before November 28, 2016, and should: 1. Annex to the Notice of Motion a properly captioned Statement of Material Facts which complies with the dictates of Local Civil Rule 56.1; 2. Provide some legal analysis with respect to whether the Note is a negotiable instrument, as defined in N.Y. U.C.C. § 1-201(21); 3. Ensure that the stamped indorsements on the original Note are entirely legible in the photocopies provided to the Court; 4. Provide a fuller explanation regarding the various indorsements, including some explanation of how the FDIC became involved, when the indorsements to IndyMac were made, and what authorized Plaintiff's employees to sign documents on behalf of the FDIC and MERS; and 5. Provide evidence in admissible form that Plaintiff possessed the Note at the time it commenced this action. The Court defers decision with respect to Plaintiff's remaining motions. The Court notes, however, that Plaintiff does not need a Court order to dismiss its claims against the Doe defendant. Plaintiff can voluntarily dismiss this defendant by filing a notice of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/26/2016. (Brucella, Michelle)
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Howard et al
ORDER granting plaintiff's 58 motion for summary judgment against defendant Howard; granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment against PNC and ECB; and granting plaintiff's motion to amend the case caption. In order to effectuate foreclosure and sale, Plaintiff is directed to submit, on or before July 13, 2018, (i) affidavits and supporting documentation sufficient for the Court to determine the amount due under the Note and (ii) a revised proposed judgment of foreclosure and sale. Any defendant who wishes to oppose these submissions may do so within fifteen (15) days of the date that the submissions are filed. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 6/15/2018. (O'Brien, Luke)
1
2018-06-15
D09002ee1ae0748d1
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-1
nyed-1_14-cv-07470_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470/pdf/USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-1.pdf
USCOURTS 1:14-cv-07470; CIT Bank, N.A. v. Howard et al;
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
New York
USCOURTS-nyed-1_14-cv-07470-1
1
2018-06-15
ORDER granting plaintiff's 58 motion for summary judgment against defendant Howard; granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment against PNC and ECB; and granting plaintiff's motion to amend the case caption. In order to effectuate foreclosure and sale, Plaintiff is directed to submit, on or before July 13, 2018, (i) affidavits and supporting documentation sufficient for the Court to determine the amount due under the Note and (ii) a revised proposed judgment of foreclosure and sale. Any defendant who wishes to oppose these submissions may do so within fifteen (15) days of the date that the submissions are filed. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 6/15/2018. (O'Brien, Luke)