Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-327 - Demirovic et al v. Ortega et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-327 - Demirovic et al v. Ortega et al
October 13, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58; granting 59; granting 66; granting in part and denying in part 70 and requiring filing of notices of appearance no later than 10/16/2017 at 8:45 a.m.; granting in part and denying in part 71; denying 76. The parties are ordered to file their proposed jury instructions on ECF no later than 10/17/2017 at 12:00 p.m.Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b), the Court sua sponte orders separate trials in this matter: the first trial will address the Non-Retaliation Claims as defined in this Order, and the Retaliation Claims will be tried to the same jury immediately after a verdict is rendered in the first trial. Jury selection will begin promptly on 10/16/2017 at 9:00 a.m., and counsel shall arrive in Courtroom 13B South no later than 8:45 a.m. on that day. See Order for details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/13/2017. (Blase, Brendan)
November 3, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 89 Motion for Restraining Order. The Court ORDERS the assets of P.O. Italianissimo Ristorante, Inc., Franklin Ortega, and Rocio Uchofen RESTRAINED pursuant to CPLR § 5229. P.O. Italianissimo Ristorante, Inc., Franklin Ortega, and Rocio Uchofen are ENJOINED and restrained, with the same effect as if a restraining notice had been served upon them after judgment, from making or suffering any sale, assignment, transfer, or interference with any property in which any of them has any interest, except as allowed by CPLR § 5222, another applicable provision of New York law, or further order of this Court. These restrictions shall apply until such time as final judgment in this action has been entered.The Court also orders P.O. Italianissimo Ristorante, Inc., Franklin Ortega, and Rocio Uchofen to respond separately to the "Post-Verdict Interrogatories and Request for Documents Used to Calculate Net Worth," attached as Exhibit A to the plaintiffs' motion, no later than November 27, 2017, and thereafter to appear for deposition as provided by CPLR § 5229 at a time to be agreed upon by all of the parties. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/3/2017. (Blase, Brendan)
November 9, 2017
PDF | More
d any of the arguments they have presented alter the Court's decision. Defendants' motion fails to meet the strict standard for reconsideration embodied in Local Civil Rule 6.3 and the Court therefore denies 106 their motion. The Court's earlier restraining Order, ECF No. 105, remains in effect as to all defendants, including Rocio Uchofen. See Order for details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/9/2017. (Blase, Brendan)ORDER denying 106 Motion for Reconsideration. As explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, the defendants do not point to any controlling decisions or material facts that the Court overlooked it rendering 105 its earlier decision, nor woul
April 24, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 92-93; granting 96; granting 110. For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion, the Court will enter judgment in the total amount of $777,533.53. Defendants P.O. Italianissimo Ristorante, Inc. and Franklin Ortega shall be jointly and severally liable for the entire amount; defendant Rocio Uchofen shall be jointly and severally liable with the Restaurant and Ortega only for the amount of $73,408.85. The Court will prepare an appropriate form of judgment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 4/24/2018. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit) (Blase, Brendan)
August 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER. Subject to reinstatement of the appeal, the parties are directed to retrieve any exhibits they wish to retain by the later of 9/14/2018 or thirty (30) days after issuance of the mandate, see Fed. R. App. P. 41(b)-(c), 40(a)(1). Any exhibits the parties have not arranged to retrieve by the deadline will be discarded without further notice. See L. Civ. R. 39.1(b)(2). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 8/8/2018. (Blase, Brendan)