Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2612 - Esperanza et al v. The City of New York et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2612 - Esperanza et al v. The City of New York et al
July 12, 2018
PDF | More
DECISION & ORDER, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court rules as follows: Defendants McKenzie and John/Jane Does 1-10 are dismissed from the case; Plaintiff Briggs has no outstanding claims against Defendants; Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to the following claims, which will proceed to trial: (a) Esperanza's and Asharafan's claims for false arrest under § 1983 and state law; (b) Edward's claim for assault and battery under state law; (c) Esperanza's claims for excessive force under § 1983, and assault and battery under state law; (d) Edward's, Esperanza's, and Asharafan's related failure to intervene claims under § 1983; and(e) Edward's, Esperanza's, and Asharafan's respondeat superior claims against the City; and 4. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to all other claims alleged against Defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 68. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 7/11/2018. (Lee, Tiffeny)