Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-4827 - Whitfield v. Lopez et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-4827 - Whitfield v. Lopez et al
October 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER finding as moot 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, DISMISSING the Complaint and Granting Limited Leave to Amend - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiff's claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, and 12 U.S.C. § 95a(2) as to all defendants and Section 1983 claims against Ms. Lopez, Mr. Burns, and NYCHA are dismissed as frivolous. Plaintiff's request to compel a criminal prosecution against any of the defendants is DENIED as is his request for an order to show cause for a preliminary injunction. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 16, 2015, that complies with the Attached Written Memorandum and Order. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, it must be submitted to the Court NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 16, 2015, and bear the same docket number as this Memorandum and Order, 15-cv-4827(DLI)(LB). For Plaintiff's convenience, "Instructions on How to Amend a Complaint" are attached to this Electronic Order. Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will replace the original pleading. All further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by November 16, 2015, or if the amended complaint fails to comply with the Attached Written Memorandum and Order, this action will be dismissed summarily with prejudice. Although plaintiff paid the filing fee, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and attachments to pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/16/2015. (Attachments: # (1) Supplement) (Irizarry, Dora)
January 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The amended complaint, is DISMISSED as to Judge Kusakabe, Robert Ratanski, Robert J. Epstein, Jane Doe Clerk, Phillip Calandrillo, Denise Brockington, Neagia Drew, John Does and Jane Does. The Clerk of Court shall amend the caption to reflect the dismissal of these defendants. The amended complaint shall proceed against Sgt. J. Williams and Lt. Barkley. It is plaintiff's obligation to effect service of process as to these defendants pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall promptly advise the Court once defendants Williams and Barkley have been served. The case is referred to the Honorable Lois Bloom, United State Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. Although plaintiff paid the filing fee, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/8/2016. C/mailed. (Docket Sheet Updated.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
May 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 32, is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and to close the action.SO So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 5/4/2017. (Tavarez, Jennifer)