Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-6360 - New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. Sukhmany Construction Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-6360 - New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. Sukhmany Construction Inc.
March 23, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and Rule 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R and the Supplemental R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with both in their entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that default judgment be entered in favor of District Council as against Sukhmany in the total amount of $16,112.73, comprised of:(i) $11,988.32 for the original arbitration award; (ii) $2,122.37 in prejudgment interest on the original award from February 19, 2016, to the date of Judge Pollaks Supplemental R&R, February 6, 2018; (iii) $500 for the arbitration fee; (iv) $675 in attorneys fees; and (v) $827.04 in costs.In addition, District Council is entitled to per diem prejudgment interest of $3.481 from the date of the Supplemental R&R to the date judgment is entered. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment pursuant to this Order and to close this case. District Council is ordered to mail a copy of this Order and accompanying judgment to Sukhmany, and to file a letter with the Court confirming compliance within one week of the filing of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/21/2018. (Taronji, Robert)