Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-6848 - United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Platinum Management (NY) LLC et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-6848 - United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Platinum Management (NY) LLC et al
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Intervene; granting 42 Motion to Stay -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Government's (represented by the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York) motion to intervene and to stay civil proceedings is granted. The SEC action is stayed pending the resolution of the criminal proceeding against the Individual Defendants. Nothing contained in this Electronic Order or the Attached Memorandum and Order is to be construed as affecting the responsibilities and actions of the Receiver in disposing of the receivership assets. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/7/2017. (Irizarry, Dora)
November 21, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION dated 11/20/17 re: that by Order dated November 11, 2017, I granted the Receivers application to approve the retention of Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. (Houlihan), nunc pro tunc to September 11, 2017(the Application), overruling the opposition to the Application filed by a large group of non-insider Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities (PPCO) investors (the Objecting Investors). This Memorandum Opinion sets forth the basis for that Order. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/20/2017 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
July 17, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 7/16/18 denying Non-Party Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. 342 Motion Non-party Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. seeks an order lifting the litigation stay in this receivership case so that it may implead one of the companies in receivership in an action pending outside the receivership. Because the costs to the Receivership and resulting prejudice to other parties-in-interest outweigh the prejudice that Navidea might suffer from deferring its litigation, the motion is denied. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/16/2018 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)