Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-758 - Erber v. Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-758 - Erber v. Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation
April 26, 2017
PDF | More
4/26/2017. (Fletcher, Camille)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons in the attached Memorandum and Order, and in light of Plaintiff's pro se status, he is granted thirty (30) days' leave to file an amended complaint. See Cruz v. Gomez, 202 F.3d 593 (2d Cir. 2000). Should Plaintiff elect to file an amended complaint, he must state whether the corporate plaintiff is withdrawn, otherwise represented by counsel, and/or if he intends to pursue the action in his own name. Additionally, he must assert a basis for the exercise of the Courts jurisdiction. Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will completely replace the original complaint, must be captioned, "Amended Complaint," and shall bear the same docket number as this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, judgment dismissing the action shall enter. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on