Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

18-2537 - Artemov v. Ramos et al

Download Files


Document in Context
18-2537 - Artemov v. Ramos et al
May 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting pro se Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Starrett City and Starrett City Department of Public Safety and her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1988, and Title VII claims against all Defendants are dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). However, Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against Defendant Ramos and her state law and NYCHRL claims against all Defendants will proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (Court's supplemental jurisdiction). The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a summons against each Defendant and the United States Marshals Service is directed to serve both the Complaint and this Order on Defendants without prepayment of fees. The case is referred to the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/8/2018. (Cuevas Ingram, Joanna)