Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-251 - Geslak v. Suffolk County et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-251 - Geslak v. Suffolk County et al
December 27, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Claims one and two are hereby dismissed, and claim three is dismissed as against Defendant County. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on December 21, 2007. (c/m-ecf) (Lee, Tiffeny)
March 5, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Reconsideration and DENIES Defendants' 51 Motion for Reconsideration and VACATES the 46 Order to the extent that it dismissed Plaintiff's claim under Exec. Law, Section 296 against County. Plaintiff may therefore proceed against all Defendants for violations of Exec. Law, Section 296 and of the Bellows consent decree. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/4/2008. (c/m) (Lee, Tiffeny)
October 23, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 66 Motion in Limine. See attached Memorandum & Order. (Backenroth, Daniel)
October 27, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Where, as here, all of plaintiff's federal claims have been dismissed before the commencement of trial, and no other extraordinary circumstances are present, dismissal without prejudice is appropriate. This case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. The parties should note that this case is being dismissed, not transferred. It must be refiled in state court.See document for further details. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 10/27/2008. (Lee, Tiffeny)