Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-1334 - Jefferson v. Rose et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-1334 - Jefferson v. Rose et al
March 29, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER - Presently pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff's request for a copy of the transcript of the March 26, 2012 preliminary injunction hearing free of charge. Plaintiff's request is DENIED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/29/12. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
April 23, 2012
PDF | More
a)ORDER granting 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. SO ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED. Defts and the Suffolk County Police Department are hereby ENJOINED from:( 1) enforcing, or threatening or attempting to enforce, the now-repealed N.Y. PENAL LAW § 240.35(1) and( 2) arresting, threatening or attempting to arrest, anyone for loitering, remaining, or wandering about for the purpose of begging. Plaintiff is warned, however, that Defts are not enjoined from arresting individuals for violating other, valid sections of the Penal Law while panhandling. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the prose Plaintiff. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/23/2012. (Florio, Lis
May 10, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER finding as moot 26 Motion to Compel. The Court sua sponte ORDERS that Jefferson v. Rose, No. 12-CV-1334, and Jefferson v. Conye, No. 13-CV-2454, be consolidated. All future filings are to be docketed in the earlier-filed case, case number 12-CV-1334. Further, the discovery schedule set by the Court at May 3, 2013 conference in case number 13-CV-2454 shall govern this consolidated action. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel, filed in case number 12-CV-1334, is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to: (1) consolidate these matters, (2) mark case number 13-CV-2454 closed, and (3) mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Joanna Seybert, Dated: May 10, 2013. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
January 17, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, Judge Lindsay's R&R (Docket Entry 63) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' motion to dismiss this case (Docket Entry 58) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and mark the case CLOSED. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/17/2018. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)