Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-6170 - Pothen v. Stoney Brook University


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-6170 - Pothen v. Stoney Brook University
September 30, 2016
PDF | More
039;s motion to dismiss is also denied as to the retaliation and hostile work environment claims under Title VII. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/30/2016. (Florio, Lisa)MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Second Amended Complaint. SO ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss is granted with respect to plaintiff's claim for Title VII discrimination as it relates to his termination, but denied with respect to the Title VII discrimination claim based upon a failure to promote, denial of overtime, negative reviews, and receipt of a disproportionately heavy workload. Defendant&#
March 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 70 Motion to Prevent Disclosure. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Defendant's Motion to Prevent Disclosure, Docket No. 70, is granted. Additionally, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, which was raised before the Court during the February 2, 2017, discovery conference, is denied. Defendant is directed to serve pro se Plaintiff with a copy of this Order at his last known address(es) and file proof of service no later than 3/17/17. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 3/15/2017. (Casalini, Rosalinde)
April 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 77 Motion for Discovery; denying 80 Motion to Compel. As set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motion, Docket No. 79, is denied; Defendant's cross motion, Docket No. 77, is granted. Specifically Plaintiff shall be deposed by Defendant no later than July 15, 2017, the Court shall not be present for the deposition, and Defendant shall not be required to pay Plaintiff for costs associated with his deposition. Additionally, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Court to extend all proceedings until June 7, 2017, Docket No. 80, is denied. Instead, the Court extends the date to complete depositions until July 15, 2017. However, all other discovery must continue. Specifically, to the extent possible, Plaintiff and Defendant shall continue to exchange discovery while Plaintiff is away. Further, all depositions shall be scheduled to occur immediately upon Plaintiff's return from vacation. Parties are directed to submit a joint status letter to this Court by May 26, 2017, which shall set forth what discovery remains and shall be accompanied by a schedule setting forth dates certain for all depositions. All depositions must be complete by July 15, 2017. All discovery must be complete by September 15, 2017, and the date for parties to take the first step in dispositive motion practice is October 15, 2017. Plaintiff is reminded that he may consult with this Court's Pro Se Department should he have any questions during the discovery process. Defendant is directed to serve Pro Se Plaintiff with a copy of this Order, and file proof of service no later than 4/25/17. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 4/21/2017. (Casalini, Rosalinde)
September 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 89 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, Docket No. 89, is denied. Discovery shall close on September 15, 2017. The Parties shall take the first step in dispositive motion practice no later than October 15, 2017. Defendant is directed to serve Plaintiff with a copy of this Order no later than 9/11/17, and file proof of service forthwith. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 9/8/2017. (Casalini, Rosalinde)