Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

13-6493 - Dougherty v. County of Suffolk et al

Download Files


Document in Context
13-6493 - Dougherty v. County of Suffolk et al
July 25, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; Since the availability of administrative remedies is a mixed question of law and fact, a hearing is necessary to determine whether administrative remedies were available to Plaintiff. Defendants are therefore directed to inform the Court on or before August 15, 2016, whether they intend to waive their exhaustion argument, or if they wish to participate in a factual hearing to resolve the issue. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 49) is thus DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and will be reinstated if Defendants prevail following the hearing. In addition, Defendants' request to substitute an exhibit (Docket Entry 50) is GRANTED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/25/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
April 20, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting 78 Motion in Limine. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 4/20/2018. (Tomlinson, A.)