Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-599 - Bentivegna v. People's United Bank et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-599 - Bentivegna v. People's United Bank et al
June 21, 2016
PDF | More
er jurisdiction. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/21/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER granting 41 Motion to Dismiss; For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants the Plaintiff's Rule 12(b)(1) motion in its entirety and dismisses the Defendants' counterclaims for lack of subject matt
August 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' 65 motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the following claims are dismissed: the Plaintiffs wage discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII, NYSHRL and EPA; the Plaintiff's NYLL wage claim; her breach of contract claim; and her unjust enrichment claim. It is denied to the extent that the following claims survive: the Plaintiff's hostile work environment claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL; the Plaintiffs termination discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL; and the Plaintiffs retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII and the NYSHRL. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 8/7/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
September 25, 2017
PDF | More
r D. Spatt on 9/25/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER - For the above stated reasons, the Plaintiff's 84 motion for reconsideration is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the Court finds that questions of fact exist as to whether the Defendants can be held liable under a theory of retaliation for searching the Plaintiff's emails and commencing litigation against her. It is denied to the extent that the Court does not depart from its previous findings as to the other alleged materially adverse employment actions. The parties are directed to file a revised Joint Pretrial Order within ten days of the entry of this decision, and are further directed to appear before the Court on October 18, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1020 of the Long Island Courthouse. Counsel is to appear authorized to discuss settlement at that time. In the event that the matter is not settled, it will be adjourned for jury selection. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthu