Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-634 - Sibley v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-634 - Sibley v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. et al
November 6, 2014
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20, 24, 34: See attached Report and Recommendation for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/6/2014. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
January 7, 2015
PDF | More
ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/7/2015. (Mahon, Cinthia) Modified on 3/5/2015 to reset the document number. (Mahon, Cinthia).MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Granting 24 Motion to Set Aside Default; denying 35 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 7 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Strike; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Lindsay's R&R (Docket Entry 42) over Plaintiff's objections. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Docket Entry 20) is DENIED and the Ratan Defendants' motion to vacate the Clerk's entry of default (Docket Entry 24) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motion to strike the Ratan Defendants' letter to Judge Lindsay requesting that the arguments contained in their motion to vacate should be considered as their opposition to Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Docket Entry 35) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to strike the original Answer (Docket Entry 7) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's motion to strike Choice Hotels' Amended Answer (Docket Entry 17) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to strike is DENIED insofar as it seeks to strike Choice Hotels' affirmative defenses. It is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to strike Choice Hotels' responses to paragraphs 3, 10, and 28 of the Complaint. The Court deems Choice Hotels' responses to paragraphs 3 and 28 as admissions. Paragraph 10 of the Amended Answer is stricken with leave to replead. Choice Hotels is ORDERED to file a second amended answer consistent with this Memorandum and Order within thirty (30) days. Before it does so, counsel must consider whether paragraphs 34-36, 44, 51, 54, 57, 59-61 of the Amended Answer fail to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b). If they do not comply, Choice Hotels should amend them accordingly. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/7/2015. C/ECF ORDER denying 35 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 7 Motion to Strike ; granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Strike ; ORDER
December 22, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying 78 Motion to Compel; denying 83 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motions set forth in Docket Entries Nos. 78 and 83 are denied in their entirety. All document and written discovery is deemed closed. Counsel shall complete discovery in the manner and the time frame as set forth in the attached Order. Absent good cause and the taking of the parties' depositions, there shall be no further extensions. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 12/22/2015. (Casalini, Rosalinde) (Main Document 84 replaced on 12/22/2015) (Imrie, Robert).
March 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 116 Motion for Sanctions. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motion for Sanctions under Docket Entry No. 116 is denied in its entirety. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 3/7/2016. (Casalini, Rosalinde)
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 122 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 124 Motion to Strike; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's objections to Judge Shields' Order dated December 22, 2015, and Electronic Order dated February 2, 2016, are OVERRULED and her appeals (Docket Entries 85 and 110) are DENIED. Plaintiff's letter motion to strike (Docket Entry 124) is DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 122) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/13/2017. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)