Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1835 - Sullivan-Mestecky v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1835 - Sullivan-Mestecky v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
July 7, 2016
PDF | More
OPINION and ORDER: For the reasons set forth (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), Prudentials motion, and the joint motion of Verizon and Wells Fargo, are granted in part and denied in part; and the motions of Xerox and Hewitt are granted to the extent set forth herein. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/7/2016. (Ortiz, Grisel)
July 26, 2017
PDF | More
OPINION & ORDER - Upon consideration of plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Shields' 1/23/2017 orders and defendants' responses thereto, and reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Shields' orders, and the evidence and motion papers before her, plaintiff's objections are overruled. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/26/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)
May 16, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's objections are overruled, the Report is accepted in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth in the Report, plaintiff's motion to strike and cross-motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are denied; Verizon's and Prudential's motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are granted; and Verizon and Prudential are granted judgment as a matter of law dismissing plaintiff's remaining claims against them in this action in their entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Verizon and Prudential in accordance with this order and close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/16/2018. (Tirado, Chelsea)