Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-4565 - J.L. et al v. Eastern Suffolk Boces et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-4565 - J.L. et al v. Eastern Suffolk Boces et al
June 29, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Based on the foregoing reasons, the Districts motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the federal claims against it and is denied with respect to the state law claims against it. Based on this Order, (i) all six causes of action remain pending against BOCES, Matera, Rauber, Golik, and individually and Does 1-10; and (ii) the second to sixth causes of action remain pending against the District. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/292015. (Coleman, Laurie)
April 19, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting DE 43 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part DE 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Sachem's motion is granted and the Boces Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Boces Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and state-law negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence claims. However, the Boces Defendants' motion is denied as to Plaintiffs' state-law assault and battery cause of action. The caption is amended to include only Golik and Boces as Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 4/19/2018. (Budhu, Ryan)