Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1035 - White v. Roosevelt UFSD Board of ED.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1035 - White v. Roosevelt UFSD Board of ED.
April 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the Court ORDERS service of the Complaint by the United States Marshal Service without prepayment of the filing fee. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the Summons, Complaint, and this Order to the USMS and the USMS shall serve the Defendant. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/6/2015. C/M (Valle, Christine)
September 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Judge Locke's R&R (Docket Entry 29) is ADOPTED in its entirety and Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 8) is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff is also granted leave to file an Amended Complaint in an effort to assert viable discrimination claims. Any Amended Complaint shall be filed within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is directed to file his Amended Complaint within ninety (90) days from the date of this Memorandum & Order. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/8/2016. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
January 30, 2018
PDF | More
will proceed. However, Plaintiff's ADA and state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint in an effort to assert viable claims under the ADA and state law consistent with the requMEMORANDUM & ORDER: SO ORDERED that Judge Locke's R&R (Docket Entry 48) is ADOPTED in its entirety and Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 37) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Title VII and Section 1981 claimsirements set forth in Judge Locke's R&R. Any Amended Complaint shall be titled Second Amended Complaint and bear the same docket number as this Order, No. 15-CV-1035(JS)(SIL). If Plaintiff wishes to pursue the ADA and state law claims, he is directed to file his Second Amended Complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this Memorandum & Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that a Second Amended Complaint, if he chooses to file one, will completely replace the Amended Complaint. Therefore, all claims and allegations Plaintiff wishes to pursue should be included in the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum & Order to the pro se Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/30/2018. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa)