Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2304 - Jefferson v. Loe et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2304 - Jefferson v. Loe et al
July 16, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the Court ORDERS service of the Summonses and Complaint upon the Defendants by the USMS. The Clerk of the Court is further ORDERED to serve a copy of the Complaint together with this Order on the Suffolk County Attorney. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/16/2015. C/M (Valle, Christine)
January 15, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court sua sponte Orders that Jefferson v. Koenig, No. 15-CV-0544, Jefferson v. Salvatore, et. al., No. 15-CV-2303, Jefferson v. Loe, et. al., No. 15-CV-2304, and Jefferson v. Soe, et. al., No. 15-CV-2305, be CONSOLIDATED. All future filings are to be docketed in the earliest-filed case, Jefferson v. Koenig, No. 15-CV-0544. Upon consolidation, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mark case numbers 15-CV-2303, 15-CV-2304, and 15-CV-2305, CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/15/2016. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
March 7, 2017
PDF | More
04- JS-ARL, 2:15-cv-02305-JS-ARL (Valle, Christine)MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Shields' R&R (Docket Entry 23) in its entirety. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Docket Entry 20) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 filed in the Consolidated Cases (No. 15-CV-2303, Docket Entry 9; No. 15-CV-2304, Docket Entry 9; and No. 15-CV-2305, Docket Entry 11) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' proposed briefing schedule for their renewed motion to dismiss the Consolidated Cases (see Docket Entry 25) is APPROVED. Defendants shall file and serve their motion to dismiss on or before April 3, 2017; Plaintiff shall file and serve his response on or before May 1, 2017; Defendants shall file and serve their reply, if any, on or before May 15, 2017. Plaintiff's claim against Officer Dubriske is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Officer Dubriske as a defendant in this action. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/7/2017. C/M; C/ECF Associated Cases: 2:15-cv-00544-JS-AYS, 2:15-cv-02303-JS-ARL, 2:15-cv-023