Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-3549 - Datiz v. International Recovery Associates, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-3549 - Datiz v. International Recovery Associates, Inc.
August 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim - For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs first and second causes of action is granted; and the Defendants motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs third and fourth causes of action is denied. The case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for discovery. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 8/4/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)
January 4, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the Court denies the Defendants 39 motion to vacate the Courts August 4, 2016 Order pursuant to Rule 60(b) and denies the Defendants 34 motion for certification for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Section 1292(b). The matter is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for the remainder of discovery. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 1/4/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
May 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER finding as moot 49 Motion for Hearing; denying 51 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 56 Motion for Hearing. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/1/2017. (Roman, Joshua)
July 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 63 Motion to Compel. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 7/24/2017. (Roman, Joshua)
July 27, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 67 and 68. The Court respectfully recommends to Judge Spatt that Defendant's motion for summary judgment be DENIED and that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED, in accordance with this Report and Recommendation. SEE ATTACHED REPORT and RECOMMENDATION. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 7/27/2018. (Tomlinson, A.)
July 31, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: The parties cross-motions for summary judgment are presently pending before the Court upon referral to United States Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. On July 9, 2018, counsel for the Defendant filed a letter, which made two requests. For the following reasons, both ofcounsels requests are denied in their entirety (SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details). It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/31/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)