Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-5269 - J.A. v. SCO Family of Services


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-5269 - J.A. v. SCO Family of Services
September 6, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amendment Motion is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file his amended complaint as a separate docket entry by 9/15/2017; and for substantially the same reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge for granting the Amendment motion, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Dismissal Motion is denied without prejudice to renew. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/6/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)
January 22, 2018
PDF | More
Anne Y. Shields on 1/22/2018. (Casalini, Rosalinde)ORDER granting in part and denying in part (54) Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice (56) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:16-cv-05269-SJF-AYS; granting in part and denying in part (44) Motion to Compel in case 2:17-cv-00306-SJF-AYS. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the motions appearing as Docket Entry No. 54 in Case No. CV 16-5269, and Docket Entry No. 44 in Case No. CV 17-306, are granted in part and denied in part. The motion appearing as Docket Entry No. 56 in Case No. CV 16-5269, is denied without prejudice. With respect to that motion, counsel are directed to confer as to a disposition of the issue raised therein in accord with the parameters set forth in this order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge