Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-5934 - Ntalianas et al v. B & A Contracting of Landmark Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-5934 - Ntalianas et al v. B & A Contracting of Landmark Inc. et al
March 31, 2018
PDF | More
ADOPTION ORDER: The Plaintiffs filed proof of service of the R&R on the Defendants. It has been more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections. As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. The R&R is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/30/2018. (Roberts, Joshua)