Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-6568 - Lamb et al v. Cuomo et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-6568 - Lamb et al v. Cuomo et al
December 19, 2016
PDF | More
copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiffs and to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/19/2016. C/M (Valle, Christine)MEMORANDUM & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs' Complaint is sua sponte DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a plausible claim. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE BY FILING AN AFFIDAVIT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS WHY AN ORDER BARRING THEM FROM FILING ANY NEW COMPLAINT RELATING TO ELECTRO MAGNETIC WAVES AND THE COVERT IMPLANTATION OF MONITORING DEVICES SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED. Plaintiffs are advised that failure to file an affidavit in accordance with this Order to Show Cause will lead to the entry of an order barring Plaintiffs from filing any new complaint relating to this issue and the Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to return to Plaintiffs, without filing, any such action. Plaintiffs are cautioned that, should they file another action relating to this issue, it is within the Court's authority to consider imposing sanctions upon them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, should Plaintiffs seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis, such status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a
January 6, 2017
PDF | More
FILING INJUNCTION ORDER denying 12 Motion for Reconsideration; Plaintiffs' Motion for reconsideration of the Order is DENIED. The Court now enters a Filing Injunction ENJOINING Plaintiffs from filing any new action in this Court relating to electro magnetic waves and the covert implantation of monitoring devices without first seeking leave of Court. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to return to Plaintiffs, without filing, any new action relating to electro magnetic waves and the covert implantation of monitoring devices if it is received without a separate application seeking leave to file. If Plaintiffs seek leave to file a new complaint and the Court finds that the new action is not subject to this filing injunction, the Court shall grant Plaintiffs leave to file the new action and it shall be assigned a civil docket number. If leave to file is denied, Plaintiffs' submission shall be filed on the Court's miscellaneous docket and a summary order denying leave to file shall be entered and no further action shall be taken. Plaintiffs are WARNED that the continued submission of frivolous civil actions may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties, upon notice and an opportunity to be heard. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, should Plaintiffs seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis, such status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/6/2017. C/M (Valle, Christine)