Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-2201 - Nodify, Inc. v. Kristan et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-2201 - Nodify, Inc. v. Kristan et al
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: SO ORDERED that Kristan's Motion to Stay Discovery is hereby DENIED. The Motion to Disqualify Counsel is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Kristan ispermitted to renew his Motion to Disqualify Counsel, if appropriate, once a trial date is scheduled in this case. For the reasons stated below, Kristans Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part. In his Motion to Dismiss, Kristan seeks to dismiss the Complaint on three grounds: (i) lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2); (ii) improper venue pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3); and (iii) failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See Motion to Dismiss.) For the reasons set forth below, Kristan's motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue are hereby DENIED. The Court reserves decision on Kristan's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), which will be addressed in a separate order. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 1/11/2018. CM to to pro defendant. (Florio, Lisa)