Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

12-1352 - View 360 Solutions LLC v. Google, Inc.

Download Files


Document in Context
12-1352 - View 360 Solutions LLC v. Google, Inc.
March 13, 2013
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 25 Motion to Transfer Case and denying Defendants' 26 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 3/13/2013. (amt)
September 10, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part #191 Plaintiffs, Defendant Google and Defendant Minds-Eye-View's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) in accordaqnce with Part II of this Decision and Order; denying as moot #152 Defendant Google's motion to dismiss the claims and cross-claims against it for lack of standing under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1); and denying #172 Defendant Grandeye's motion to Amend its Amended Answer, Counterclaims and Cross-claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Plaintiffs View 360 Solutions, LLC and Ford Oxaal and Defendant Minds-Eye-View, Inc. from this case. The only remaining claims are Defendant Grandeye Limiteds cross-counterclaims against Defendant Google and Defendant Googles declaratory judgment cross-claims against Defendant Grandeye. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Dancks for the determination of the status of discovery, dispositive motions or whether this case is trial ready. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/10/15. (lmw)
July 27, 2016
PDF | More
hment added on 8/11/2016: # (1) Sealed unredacted Decision and Order) (lmw).iled under seal due to potential confidential information. The parties shall file under seal via email to [email protected] by 8/1/16, a letter motion requesting redaction, specifically identifying the information proposed for redactREDACTED DECISION AND ORDER denying #215 Defendant Google's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; and denying #220 Defendant Grandeye's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This Decision and Order is temporarily fion, and explaining why the information is confidential pursuant to a prior agreement and/or order (and why the confidentiality has not previously been waived by the parties). Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 7/27/16. (lmw) (Additional attac