Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-709 - Trostle v. The State of New York et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-709 - Trostle v. The State of New York et al
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER granting #31 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. All of the claims in Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) are dismissed, except for her Title VII retaliation claim against the State of New York, which shall be dismissed if not corrected as specified within this Decision and Order. Plaintiff has FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Decision and Order to file an Amended Complaint asserting her Title VII retaliation claim (Count Two in the original Complaint) against DOCCS; and should Plaintiff fail to file an Amended Complaint by APRIL 7, 2016, Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim against the State of New York shall be DISMISSED without further Order of the Court. Defense counsel is directed to file a letter on the docket by APRIL 1, 2016 advising whether or not he is authorized to accept service of the Amended Complaint on behalf of Defendant DOCCS. If defense counsel will not accept service, Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of that Amended Complaint upon Defendant DOCCS pursuant to Rule 4 of the Fed.R.Civ.P., and file an affidavit of service thereafter. Defendant DOCCS is directed to file an answer thereafter pursuant to Rule 12. Upon the filing of the Amended Complaint and response thereto, a pretrial conference will be scheduled to set a trial date. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/24/16. (lmw)