Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-1184 - Hancock et al v. County of Rensselaer et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-1184 - Hancock et al v. County of Rensselaer et al
August 5, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER that the 122 Motion for Summary Judgment by Elaine Young is granted; that the 123 Motion for Summary Judgment by defts County of Rensselaer, Jack Mahar and David Hetman is granted; and that the action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/5/2016. (see) (Main Document 142 replaced on 8/8/2016) (jlm).
August 29, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER that the motion for summary judgment by Defendant Elaine Young (Dkt. No. 151) is granted and the motion for summary judgment by Defendants County of Rensselaer, Jack Mahar, and David Hetman (Dkt. No. 149) is granted with respect to Jack Mahar and David Hetman, and denied as to the County of Rensselaer. The claims against Defendants Elaine Young, Jack Mahar, and David Hetman are dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs' claims against the County of Rensselaer will be scheduled for trial. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/29/18. (rjb, )