Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-020 - Gilmore v. Carey et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-020 - Gilmore v. Carey et al
June 8, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION & ORDER: It is Ordered that Defendant's # 40 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; # 42 Motion to Dismiss; and # 46 Motion to Dismiss are hereby DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/8/2016. {Copy sent to the pro se plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)
January 19, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: It is Ordered that the # 64 Motion for Discovery; and # 66 Motion to Compel are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) Defendants Carey and Yannone shall respond to Demands # 1(b) and to 1(e) only to theextent that the reports in question detail the arrest of the Plaintiff on January 11, 2012, and any force used or not used in connection with the arrest. The Court will not compel responses to Demands ## 1(a), (c), (d), (f), & (g). (2) Defendants Youngblood, Donn, and Auigar shall respond to Demand # 2(c) only to the extent that the reports in question detail the arrest of the Plaintiff on January 11, 2012, and any force used or not used in connection with the arrest. The Court will not compel responses to Demands ## 2(a), (b), & (d). (3) Defendants Jones, Gregory, Sager, and Frascello shall respond only to Demand # 3(c). (4) Defendants Hubicki and Juliano shall respond only to Demands ## 4(a), (b), (c), & (d). Pursuant to FED R. CIV. P. 72(a), the parties have fourteen (14) days1 within which to file written objections to the foregoing discovery order. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court. As specifically noted in Rule 72(a) [a] party may not assign as error a defect in the order not timely objected to.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 1/18/2017. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiff via regular mail) (jmb)
May 16, 2017
PDF | More
DECISION & ORDER: It is Ordered that the # 72 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants' Hubicki and Juliano is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/16/2017. (Copy served upon the pro se plaintiff via regular mail) (jmb)