Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1499 - Bitetto v. D'Angelo et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1499 - Bitetto v. D'Angelo et al
December 21, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Marco Bitetto. ORDERED that pltf's 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; and it is RECOMMENDED that pltf's 1 complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice, excepting pltf's claim for monetary relief pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is to be DISMISSED with prejudice. ( Objections to R&R due by 1/9/2017, Case Review Deadline 1/11/2017), Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 12/20/2016. (Copy served upon pltf via regular mail on 12/21/2016)(see)
January 27, 2017
PDF | More
on pro se plaintiff via regular mail)DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting #4 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report and Recommendation in its entirety; Plaintiff's claim for monetary relief pursuant to Title III of the ADA is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Amend his complaint is granted; and Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint at Docket #5 is accepted for filing, and the Clerk is directed to separately file and docket that pleading (which is already signed) as the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. This action is returned to Magistrate Hummel for his management of pretrial matters, including his review of the pleading sufficiency of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/27/17. (lmw) (Copy served up
April 9, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's 7 amended complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice to providing plaintiff with a final opportunity to file an amended complaint to cure the defects; RECOMMENDED, that if the District Judge adopts this Report- Recommendation and Order in full, should plaintiff wish to proceed with this action, he must file any second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the District Judge's Order adopting of this Report-Recommendation and Order, and that, following the District Judge's review of this Report-Recommendation and Order, if a second amended complaint is filed, the Clerk return this case to the Magistrate Judge for review of any Second Amended Complaint.( Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2018, Case Review Deadline 4/30/2018), ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 4/9/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
June 6, 2018
PDF | More
hall be referred to Magistrate Judge Hummel for his review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 6/6/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting #8 Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report-Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) shall be Dismissed with prejudice without further Order of this Court, unless within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Decision and Order, Plaintiff files a Second Amended Complaint that corrects the pleading defects identified in the Report-Recommendation; and that, should Plaintiff timely file a Second Amended Complaint, it s