Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1276 - Bonilla v. New York State


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1276 - Bonilla v. New York State
November 12, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT, RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Daniel Ray Bonilla, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daniel Ray Bonilla.ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is GRANTED; and it is further hereby respectfullyRECOMMENDED that plaintiff's complaint in this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice as against the State, but otherwise with leave to replead within thirty days of any decision adopting this report and recommendation. NOTICE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties may lodge written objections to the foregoing report. Such objections must be filed with the clerk of the court within FOURTEEN days of service of this report. FAILURE TO SO OBJECT TO THIS REPORT WILL PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(d), 72; Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1993) Objections to R&R due by 11/30/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 11/12/2015. (khr)[Mailed copy of R&R to pro se plaintiff on 11/12/2015]
February 9, 2016
PDF | More
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and it is further ORDERED, that the proposed Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this action; and it is furtherORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court forward the proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 8) to U.S. Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles for initial review. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 09, 2016.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas)
April 14, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Complaint filed by Daniel Ray Bonilla. RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's complaint in this action (Dkt. No. 8) be DISMISSED without leave to replead. NOTICE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1), the parties may lodge written objections to the foregoing report. Such objections must be filed with the clerk of the court within FOURTEEN days of service of this report. FAILURE TO SO OBJECT TO THIS REPORT WILL PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(d), 72; Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1993). Objections to R&R due by 5/2/2016 Case Review Deadline 5/5/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 4/14/2016. (khr)Mailed copy of R&R to pro se plaintiff via regular mail on 4/14/2016.
May 12, 2016
PDF | More
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 10) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 12, 2016.***A copy of this order & subsequent judgment was served upon the pro se party by Certified US Mail & Regular US Mail. (sas)