Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1595 - Shenko v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1595 - Shenko v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
April 17, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, is GRANTED; and RECOMMENDED that the amended complaint, Dkt. No. 5, be dismissed with leave to amend the claims against the FBI, Homeland Security, the Town of New Hartford, and Officer Freiberger and without leave to amend the claims against the New Hartford Police Department. (Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2015, Case Review Deadline 5/8/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 4/17/2015. [copy of RRO sent by regular mail to plaintiff](lah)
June 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 5) is DISMISSED with leave to amend claims against the FBI, Homeland Security, the Town of New Hartford, and Officer Freiberger; and is DISMISSED without leave to amend claims against the New Hartford Police Department; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amendment (Dkt. No. 12) to claim and Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 14) are STRICKEN from the docket as improper pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file one amended complaint in accordance with the Report-Recommendation; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Brief (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Request (Dkt. No. 19) for permission to resubmit an amended complaint is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 18, 2015.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas)
February 29, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER re 34 Second Amended Complaint filed by Linda J. Shenko. RECOMMENDED that the Second Amended Complaint be DISMISSED in its Entirety without Leave to Amend for Failure to State a Claim; RECOMMENDED that the District Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice; and ORDERED that plaintiff's letter request, Dkt.No. 35, seeking to amend the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 3/17/2016 Case Review Deadline 3/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 2/29/2016. [Copy sent by regular mail and certified return receipt mail](lah, )
April 18, 2016
PDF | More
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 40) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 34) is DISMISSED in its entirety without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims without prejudice to the re-filing of the claims in state court; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Request (Dkt. No. 35) seeking to amend the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on April 18, 2016.***A copy of this order & subsequent judgment was served upon the pro se party by Certified US Mail & Regular US Mail. (sas)