Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-795 - Perez v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-795 - Perez v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al
July 14, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER that Plaintiff's IFP Application, Dkt. No. 2 is GRANTED; and RECOMMMENDED that Plaintiff's Title VII claim be DISMISSED WITH PREJUJDICE as against defendants Briggs and Cole; and RECOMMENDED that the action otherwise be allowed to proceed against defendants Ruby Tuesday, Cole, and Briggs; ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 3, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.( Objections to R&R due by 8/1/2016, Case Review Deadline 8/4/2016), Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 7/14/2016. [copy of RRO and unpublished decision served on pltf by regular and certified return receipt mail](lah)
January 30, 2018
PDF | More
DECISION and ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Title VII claim is DISMISSED with prejudice as against defendants Roberta Briggs and Gary Cole; and Plaintiff's Title VII claim is allowed to proceed against defendant Ruby Tuesday and plaintiff's New York State Human Rights Law claim is allowed to proceed against defendants Ruby Tuesday, Roberta Briggs, and Gary Cole. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/30/2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)