Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-754 - Hogan et al v. County of Lewis, New York et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-754 - Hogan et al v. County of Lewis, New York et al
March 8, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that the Lewis County Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 39) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that all claims against the Lewis County Defendants except the conspiracy claim arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of Plaintiffs rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Falter and Wilsons Motion (Dkt. No. 43) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and it further ORDERED, that all claims against Defendants Falter and Wilson except the claims for private nuisance and for violation of Plaintiffs civil rights (the Fourteenth, Fifteenth, and Sixteenth Causes of Action) are DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 08, 2013. (sas)
January 10, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that the First Motion (Dkt. No. 126) and Second Motion (Dkt. No. 131) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is furtherORDERED, that the First Motion (Dkt. No. 126), to the extent it seeks reinstatement of Plaintiffs claim for loss of consortium again Defendants Falter and Wilson, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the First Motion (Dkt. No. 126), to the extent it seeks reinstatement of any other claim, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Second Motion (Dkt. No. 131), to the extent is seeks reinstatement of Plaintiffs § 1983 and common law claim against Defendant Lewis County for abuse of process, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Second Motion (Dkt. No. 131), to the extent it seeks reinstatement of any other claim, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Second Motion (Dkt. No. 131), to the extent it seeks leave to amend Plaintiffs Supplemental Complaint (Dkt No. 87), is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 10, 2014. (sas)
March 26, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendant David Vandewaters First Motion (Dkt. No. 171) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that all claims against Defendant David Vandewater except for Plaintiffs interference with easement and private nuisance claims are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Russell Falter and Kathy Wilsons Second Motion (Dkt. No. 174) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that all claims against Defendants Russell Falter and Kathy Wilson except for Plaintiffs private nuisance claim are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants County of Lewis, New York; Ryan Lehman; Brett Croneiser; Leanne Moser; and Caleb Petzoldts Motion (Dkt. No. 176) for summary judgment is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that all claims against Defendants County of Lewis, New York; Ryan Lehman; Brett Croneiser; Leanne Moser; and Caleb Petzoldt are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant Frank Roses Motion (Dkt. No. 177) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that all claims against Defendant Frank Rose except for Plaintiffs private nuisance and loss of consortium claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 26, 2015. (sas)
December 16, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendant David Vandewaters Motion (Dkt. No. 245) to remand is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Falter and Wilsons Motion (Dkt. No. 256) to amend the caption is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 248) for reconsideration is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Vandewater, Rose, Falter, and Wilsons stay Requests (Dkt. Nos. 270-272) are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs First Motion (Dkt. No. 273) in limine is DENIED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Vandewater and Roses Letter Motions (Dkt. Nos. 274 and 276) and Plaintiffs Letter Motion (Dkt. No. 275) in response to the stay Requests are STRICKEN from the docket as impermissible reply briefs pursuant to Local Rule 7.1. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on December 16, 2015. (sas)
July 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT that plaintiffs' claims are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on 7/14/2017. (see)