Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-1419 - Richardson v. Artus


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-1419 - Richardson v. Artus
September 22, 2009
PDF | More
REPORT, RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED as Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). RECOMMENDED, that no certificate of appealability issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2009 Case Review Deadline 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on 9/22/09. (Report Recommendation and Order served on petitioner by regular mail with copies of the electronically-available-only opinions cited in the Report, Recommendation and Order.)(alh, )
March 29, 2010
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 26 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that the 1 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety. ORDERED, that a Certificate of Appealability not issue with respect to any of the claims set forth in the Petition, because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of aconstitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/29/10. (Decision and Order served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )