Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-1268 - Barrow v. VanBuren et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-1268 - Barrow v. VanBuren et al
September 25, 2014
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action (Dkt. No 67) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described herein. RECOMMENDED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 67) be dismissed as no arguments were made in support of this motion. Objections to R&R due by 10/14/2014 Case Review Deadline 10/16/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 9/25/14. (Attachments: # (1) Unpublished Decisions Cited) (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
January 30, 2015
PDF | More
bitionism and foot condition; (3) all Fourteenth Amendment claims; (4) the ADA claim; and (5) the RA claim. ORDERED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim insofar as it alleges deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's depression. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/30/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the September 25, 2014 70 Report-Recommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Hummel is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reasons set forth therein. ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that Plaintiff's following claims are DISMISSED; (1) all First Amendment claims; (2) all Eighth Amendment claims insofar as they allege inadequate prison conditions, inadequate treatment, and deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's exhi
November 25, 2015
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 83) is DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/24/15. (served via regular mail on plaintiff)(alh, )
August 9, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that defendant Dr. Lawrence Farago's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 87) be GRANTED in all respects as to all claims. RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Vincent Barrows second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 50) be DISMISSED in its entirety. Objections to R&R due by 8/26/2016 Case Review Deadline 8/30/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 8/9/16. (Attachments: # (1) Unpublished Decisions)(served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
September 19, 2016
PDF | More
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report-Recommendation and Order, Dkt. No. 102, is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that Defendant Farago's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 87) is GRANTED. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/19/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
September 19, 2016
PDF | More
JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the Order of the Honorable Judge Mae A. D'Agostino dated the 19th day of September 2016. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )